SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: marcos who wrote (156314)1/18/2005 9:14:32 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
The governments of Israel were Labour until the '70s, and it was the reconstituted Likud that made progress in exchanging land for peace (in the Sinai). There was never a point where Jabotinsky's Greater Israel designs mattered as policy. Israel accepted the Partition Plan.

I do not make a case for ethnic cleansing, because I do not approve of it. I do, though, approve of forceful response to terrorists.

The point seems, again, to elude you. A claim to sovereignty has to be reasonable in order to be recognized, especially if defending it will require external participation. It is not at all good enough to say "mind your own business".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News