A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: fresc who wrote (262)	1/18/2005 10:18:17 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 42652

I am not a lobbyist, nor do I have any connection to "big pharma" even as a shareholder (except as an owner of mutual funds and not ones that specialize in the pharmaceutical industry). But even if I was a paid PR flak or lobbyist for the drug industry calling what I say "lobbyist propaganda" would not be an argument against it. Lobbyists and PR reps are not automatically wrong. Big Pharma are Fat Cats! To think if you didn't pay those ridiculous costs that Big pharma would reduce research . lol! Drug companies respond to economic incentives just like anyone else. Reduce the expected return on investment (including research) and you get less of it. Its a very simple non-controversial economic idea. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next