SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (156466)1/18/2005 1:48:49 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Oh, bla bla bla ... look Neo, it was zionists who crossed the sea to take arab land, not the other way round

Sure, Gromyko said that was fine by him, what did he care, he was a frickin russian

This is not a very useful page for your cause, there are holes in it all over ... for instance, it uses weasel words to suggest that 'the Jews of Palestine' accepted entirely the partition, when the fact is that zionist terrorism continued strong all through 1947 and 1948, they were killing and intimidating all the brits and arabs they possibly could, also they never stopped or even slowed down the puking of personnel and arms into the country from offshore

Another - they present as 'myth' that zionists took all the cultivable land, then in the 'refutation' they readily admit that that was the case ... also admit that zionists had acquired less than nine per cent of the land by partition, then go on to say they got the rest by chasing away the indigenous

Well, that's my point precisely, that all you have to go on is the right of conquest ... which hands to those you've dispossessed the right of reconquest

... wish i had time for this stuff today, but won't have much ... cheers

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext