Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (27041)	1/19/2005 12:40:09 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) of 90947

I don't know about that Dipy. Voting for the authorization to use force in Iraq shouldn't disqualify a candidate. One needs to speak softly but carry a big stick. Taking away the stick takes away the leverage you need to deal with the Saddams of the world. But that said, Saddam was not our special project. Saddam was a problem of the entire world. We needed to work in concert with our allies. But beyond that we needed to underscore the war on terror by getting to Al Qaeda and bin Laden. One of the reasons that we attacked Iraq was so that Saddam couldn't pass off WMD to a terrorist. But there are WMD all over the world. Iran, Pakistan, the Former Soviet Union, Korea and in the cracks and crevices in between. We cannot clean up every possible source of WMD, and in the case of Saddam he had none. We need to go after the folks that have designs to use WMD on the US. No one has demonstrated that Saddam had capability or design on the US. Certainly we all know that bin Laden has the design. Wouldn't it be prudent to strike at the head of the serpent rather than at the tail? Orca

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next