Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: neolib who wrote (156581)	1/19/2005 2:47:27 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) of 281500

IMHO, you are confusing cause and effect. The effect of Jewish migration was colonial. The cause was indeed desperate necessity The effect was displacement. It wasn't colonial because Israel is not a colony. Your basic premise is that if Europeans displace Asians, this equals colonialization and is utterly unacceptable. However, if Asians displace Asians, they may displace and ethnically clear to their hearts content; different rules for them. This seems more than a little peculiar, as the results for the displaced people, whom you claim to care about, are the same. Not to mention that the results for the displacers are also different, if they were running for their lives. Show me a post-colonial history of South Africa that puts all the blame on the Zulus and not on the Boers.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next