Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Janice Shell who wrote (2398)	1/23/2005 8:31:00 PM
From: olivier asser	Read Replies (1) of 5425

Are you telling me that there's not a dramatic difference in volume between OTC and exchange-traded securities? What do you call thinly traded? What was daily volume when AP wanted to cover 100k shares? It wasn't 20 mill daily, so you see my point? --------------------> AP wanted to cover at a discount to the prevailing market price by pressuring executives to hand them over or else. Had he tried to cover those shares in the market like any law-abiding trader then MM's and longs would have likely seen that coming - not least because in AP's words he never lies and posts all recs here so the cover would be common knowledge...and more than likely that would have sent the stock into major squeeze mode. IMO, more than anything else, the most damning allegations are AP's direct "negotiations" - "hard bargaining" lol - with companies he targeted, not quite in keeping with his publicly-stated aim of slamming scams for the benefit of the public.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next