CONSPIRACY THEORIES Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : CONSPIRACY THEORIES

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: BubbaFred who wrote (109)	1/24/2005 3:52:21 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) of 418

Re: Radioactive ash? Well, the simultaneous explosions of 5 or 6 one-megaton nukes 16,000 feet under the ocean's surface must be detectable, one way or another... Infrared? Red and lower frequencies are absorbed by water --hence the deeper you dive the bluer it gets... I guess that's also why satellites can't pick up the heat released by submarines... But the heat released by FIVE nukes????? Five gas bubbles pulsing and rising to the surface? I believe it was possible for a (forest-)fire-monitoring satellite to detect the temperature gradient resulting from the gas bubbles popping up at the (ocean's) surface. As for radioactive fallout, a radioactive aerosol might also have been detectable. Then again, remember Chernobyl: European media kept speculating about the path followed by the "nuclear cloud" over Europe --yet we were NEVER showed actual satellite pictures... Classified up to this day! Gus

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next