SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (94443)1/24/2005 7:17:44 AM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (2) of 108807
 
"What if your clause one and clause two are in conflict?"

Change the law. Legally, of course.

"I would argue that all anti choice folks disparage abortion."

You didn't say they "intended to denigrate" abortion, but rather the women. You can't know that to be their intent - you can only speculate based on your own assumptions because, over the several years they've been burying these remains, they sought no publicity, made no protests, and denigrated no one. And even now, those involved explain their actions as driven by a belief that "all people should have proper burials", "never [to] condemn any woman or judge them". Forgive me, but until proven a liar, I'll take her at her word. You can assume things not in evidence if you want to, but don't pretend they're facts.

Anyway, if what they've been doing is illegal, I'm sure state or local authorities will address that, but there is no reason to contrive hateful intentions where there is no evidence they exist. Are you projecting, perhaps?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext