SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (156891)1/24/2005 12:13:51 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Saddam would have continued to be irrelevant to our security interests. Al Qaida would have been greatly diminished if we had focused on them as our primary objective. We would have multiple options for dealing with a range of real security threats such as North Korea. Arafat would have died and peace prospects would depend on the will of both sides -- in short, we would be far better off and far safer -- Iraq would be a mess left to be dealt with a later time, but the situation would most likely have moved along with continued inspections -- we might have been forced to accept the truth about Iraq -- no wmds, no threat.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News