Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: SI Bob who wrote (89751)	1/25/2005 1:54:31 PM
From: peter michaelson	Read Replies (1) of 122087

Wow, Bob, that post was a fabulous piece of work. Personally I don't know what to think now. I am well aware that Tony is no angel but I am still in the dark as to what specific criminal acts (including which stock, which victim, etc) Tony was convicted of. If anyone can point out the details I would be very grateful. I find it impossible to assess the verdict without knowing what he was found guilty of. There's a lot of discussion here and people coming to conclusions based on the verdict, but without knowing the specific crimes it's easy to draw an incorrect conclusion. Some people seem to think he was found guilty of posting facts on Raging Bull, guilty of spearheading a group that posted facts on Raging Bull, guilty of posting rudely, guilty of shorting and then posting facts, guilty of being exploitive, guilty of pretending he was something he was not, guilty of being greedy, guilty of supporting terroris, guilty of ratting out colleagues etc etc. I would like additional clarity. Peter

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next