SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bridge Player who wrote (96748)1/25/2005 9:45:37 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) of 793711
 
Great question, BP! I am opposed to racial classifications of any type, on any forms, or any government (or any other) programs.

After all, after a few generations, when we "mix" as well as we do, what kind of racial classification can we have?

The only exceptions to this could be, imo anyway, is if both parents are for say...Switzerland....and both sets of parents before them, and all four sets of parents before them....etc back to about 10-20 generations...all from Switzerland, or Saudi Arabia, or name-the-country. Then, it's probably safe to say that the current generation are of Swiss (or whatever the country that the 10-20 generations have inhabited) descent.

But how does one determine race or culture, or much of anything else, when the parents (2), grandparents (4), great-grandparents (8), great-great-grandparents (16), etc etc...were every one of them, from a different country, and with a different set of cultural and religious backgrounds....

Unless we do a DNA test on everyone....how can the average lay person know what "racial" category someone "belongs" in....And in the end, why does it matter.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext