SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nazbuster who wrote (89933)1/25/2005 11:22:57 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (4) of 122087
 
I agree. I don't think Tony "induced" Royer to do anything. I think Royer was out to cancel his debts, however he could. His initial contact was Cleveland.

And if I were in contact with an FBI agent who told me it was perfectly okay for him to give me information, I guess I'd buy into that. What many here may have missed is that the fact that Tony told his site members that he was getting information from the FBI strongly suggests that he felt Royer was allowed to give him that information.

Why didn't Tony get hia trial separated from Royer's? In my opinion, that was a fatal error. I think that was because, right or wrong, Tony felt they'd done nothing wrong. lol, well nothing much wrong.

And why did Tony want a jury trial? Much of this case turned on points of law that jurors may or may not understand. In his place, I'd certainly have waived right to trial by jury, especially if I didn't plan on testifying.

There's a lot wrong with this whole process. I hope we'll have the opportunity to see a transcript of all the testimony.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext