Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: neolib who wrote (97040)	1/26/2005 5:18:10 PM
From: aladin	Read Replies (2) of 793725

Neolib, The Caucasian standard is higher. the standard states: An attempt should be made to determine and record the employee's race or ethnicity. Often this can be done with adequate accuracy merely by observation. If in doubt, ask the employee, explaining that race affects the reference values used for the test. If the employee considers the question objectionable, or if their race or ethnicity does not clearly fit the limited categories available, just record unknown and use Caucasian reference equations (no race correction orrace-specific reference value). So it can be viewed 2 ways - if you assume the same starting FEV - blacks of the same weight/body mass as whites get more dirty air. However if you accept the body mass FEV result as scientific - many blacks would be excluded from employment. Probably a fairer approach would be to measure individual employees and chart lung function over time. Degrading by a certain percentage being the real marker. But I assume doctors and NAACP have looked at this by now, but who knows? John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next