International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TheBusDriver who wrote (19713)	9/2/1997 4:19:00 PM
From: Victorio	of 35569

I heard from a friend that IPM prevailed today in a permanent injunction against the Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources. The ADOMM mandate is to run a rock museum and promote mining in Arizona. They have no legal or statutory authority to regulate, review or even comment on mining companies in Arizona. Needless to say they have caused much damage to IPM (see internet comments on this thread by Desert Fox or ADOMM director Mason Coggin) and its shareholders over many years. For those that still do not understand here is comparison: The office of tourism for the State of Arizona has the same type of mandate as the ADOMM. Imagine if they were promoting Arizona as a vacation spot and made disparaging comments about Holiday Inns that no one should stay there nor become a shareholder.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next