Of course, you DON'T believe that flight 93 was shot down YET are "completely willing" to believe it[.]
Correct. It is conceivable to me that the flight was shot down; quite, even. But as of this point, I haven't seen any convincing evidence of such.
And of all the nonsensical silliness bandied about on this thread - not the least of which, a "wern't no planes!" theory - the concept that one of the planes might have been shot down isn't, in my mind, a terribly great leap.
But, like all other assertions, it needs to be proven, and that hasn't happened yet.
The fact is, I'm completely willing to consider...and potentially accept as representative of the truth...virtually any theory that is accompanied by proper and credible documentation, logical reasoning, and containing a degree of falsifiability.
Thank you so much, Your Honor!! Thank you for budging THAT far to the conspiratorial fringe.... Your intellectual mercy is boundless indeed!
I'm not sorry if my exacting skepticism leaves you feeling bruised or hurt. That is, for better or worse, a by-product of the collision of ideas.
However: if it is - as the above statement suggests - of critical importance to you that I accept your theories, you're going to have to work much harder than you have been.
e |