Robert, I did see the press release that you refer to. I do not know what to make of it however. It is typical of the information that CTY hands out: long on Bull Sh!t, short on details. For instance, the report gives no indication of how much they paid for the company or  even how much revenue, or how much revenue HST group gets. 
  The descriptions of what HST group does, and CTY's business is  hilarious. I thought I knew what CTY did until I read these  statements, not I'm not sure :-).
  Assuming that HST has 50 people that they can bill out at $70 / hour,  and bill about 1750 hours per year, they can get revenue of about $6.5  MM from HST. Assuming that CTY continues to grow its sales by 26% to  the end of the year, then they will do about $58MM of sales this  (excluding the products division which they have dumped). This will  put them back to where they were in 1995. If this is the case, then  they might make about $0.35 / share (before taxes and any other costs/ write offs relating to acquisitions and sales of business). This is a  Scientific Wild-Assed Guess (SWAG), and as with any SWAG, there are  lots of unstated assumptions.
  Regarding HST, I'm not even sure what this company does. The release  is loaded with MBA and information systems type jargon, which is  always a laugh to read because it uses so many words to say nothing at  all. I just gots to gets me some of them thar buiness transformation  and renewal services.
  I like the statment: "HST's approach is both unique and balanced. The  approach not only combines the principles of structural change and   behavioural change; but also uses as one of its cornerstones, the  structuring of corporate knowledge to build a picture and a path  for  change that is understood and supported at all levels within the  organization". What the hell does this mean? 
  Look at what Larry O'Briens says about CTY: "We see substantial  opportunities for continued growth within our current services  offerings and within new technology services that complement our  existing offerings." Ok that makes sense: he beleives that CTY's  existing and new businesses will grow (why would he buy a new business  that he doesn;t think is going to grow). But then he says "We believe  that  HST Group Ltd. represents one of these new service offerings."  To paraphrase: "We beleieve that this new company that we bought  provides new services that we have to sell". We're paying this guy who makes statements like this to run the company. 
  Also look at another thing about this company. Last year they made net  earnings of $1.3 MM. The year before they made $3.0 MM. Executive  compensation was as follows:
  Name			1996 Amount		1995 Amount Larry O'Brien    $189 k           $271 k Dugald Buchanan  $237 k           $299 k Ray Basler       $160 k           $196 k Glen Gray        $187 k           $137 k Edward Lambert   $167 k           $206 k
  TOTAL	         $940 k          $1109 k
  i.e., the amount of money that the owners of the company got out of  the company (in terms of retained earings) decreased by 67% while the  amount of money that the management got decreased by 20%. To me, it  looks like the company is being run for the benifit of the management,  rather than for the benifit of the owners. As I have said in the past,   my opinion is that the management of this company is lazy, and is not  interested in the shareholders in the least. Their annual reports  provide little information that is of use to the shareholders, and  their press releases are a joke.
  In my experience, companies either make a go of it, or they hang  around stinking the place out for years. I think that CTY might fall  into the latter category.
  Regards, John Sladek |