SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pluvia who wrote (2712)2/2/2005 9:37:18 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) of 5425
 
Hey, I'm all smiles as I'm willing to remind folks of just what is synonymous with the likes of you and your ad hominem laden tyrannical tirades of filth for arguments, where common sense should be employed instead.

Re: "chuckle about that one... and your pathetic, denial... and non-stop braying about how wrong we were... meanwhile, we shorted at 160's and the stock's at $3.16?"

No no, I bray about how criminal you are, first. How wrong you are just goes hand in hand with that. Did I mention your strongly implied and repeated ad nauseum false implications about the extent of the success of your own buys and sells involving TERN? Of course, if what you say now carries honest implications, then you certainly DID get in earlier (probably tOO much earlier than was comfortable for you, indeed) than your followers. You followed in step with the illegal pattern the Federal Judge in the TERN case has testified to discovering.

A question is, how long was it between the time you did in fact say on this site that you had "sold
Terayon way back when,(I accurately paraphrase, and "when" was probably in the 30's per share, or perhaps more than 10x the 3.16 you now use in your continued "tout" of yourself, as I recall)," and the time you actually had sold indeed?

A question is, did you - like the short sellers known to be involved and already "nabbed" in the case, have an interest in touting the TERN short due to a then currently badly LOSING short position? Did you sell short with them at 30? 40? 60? 80 125?...and still were losing, as they were (we all know and/or we can easily verify, that you concurrently abetted their efforts as you verily repeated in virtual lockstep with them the details of their illegally contrived and scripted short bash)?

Well, you did admit your sale of TERN, albeit after the fact and long before the stock hit so low as $3.16. I'd bet my hat you didn't short any relative much stock very near 160, nor finally sell significantly closer to $3.18. You folks were lucky to get a score at all, and can only bless the great Nasdaq rise and FALL (all back in Clinton's time, mind you).

Yes, you didn't, to my knowledge, report your "getting out" in its time - not on this site (let alone the Terayon thread, as might seem appropriate) - to your "followers." And your silence as to how you came to tout the TERN short just when - as the Federal Judge discovered - a quite illegal (and justifiably so, IMO) "short tout" scheme was afoot, is interesting indeed to witness here, if over and over again ad nauseum (I swear, worse than me and my wind, all in all).

Hey, Freedom Works, not your hooey for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

Dan B.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext