Pluvia vs. Westergaard Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Pluvia vs. Westergaard

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Louis Riley who wrote (986)	9/2/1997 10:38:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	of 1267

Louis, as a 'former warrantholder' you haven't been harmed by Pluvia's lil' ole posts on SI. You engaged in a transaction that had some risk. I could have gone onto the PLSIA thread and said that they are really a fast food chain and didn't know lasers from lard. If the value of your warrants went down, it's because the market decided so... Let's try it: Tomorrow, you buy some PLSIA -- just a small amount that you don't mind losing. Then I'll make an untruthful post on the PLSIA thread saying that the company hasn't sold one darn laser and doesn't intend to -- in fact, their real business is to smuggle cocaine-laced hamburgers into Mexico. Afterwards, you can attempt to have your lawyers crawl all over my butt, but they'll decline. The reason why they will decline is found in the SI Terms of Use which is linked at the bottom of nearly all SI screens you arrive at when you use this forum: "You should exercise discretion and skepticism before relying on information in these messages, since it may be incorrect or misleading. Users may pretend to be people that they're not. You rely on information posted by other users solely at your own risk." Good Luck with your suit -- hope it fits. -MrB

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next