Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: combjelly who wrote (217261)	2/4/2005 12:48:23 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 1572507

You have a link? Your the one making the extreme claim. But if you want a link try ltgov.state.ri.us ltgov.state.ri.us infoplease.com And since you said "What we have now is about the same percentage of the population is living beyond 70 or so as has always." There is the simple fact that the average life expectancy used to be a lower number then my current age (36) if you go back far enough. scb.se Thi link includes lfe expectancy at 65, not just from birth. efmoody.com And then probably best of all Table 1: Life Expectancy for Social Security Year Cohort Turned 65 Percentage of Population Surviving from Age 21 to Age 65 ssa.gov From 1940 to 1990 it goes from 53.9 to 72.3 in men and 60.6 to 83.6 for women. It took me two minutes to get all of that from google. I think your educated enough to already know the general facts (without the specific details like exact life expectancy and exact %'s living to specific ages), and to know that it would not be hard to find supporting info. I wonder why you even bother with the "Got a link?" Finding a link is just too easy, and my point would be just as true if I didn't know how to use a search engine. Tim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next