SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (216884)2/4/2005 2:44:21 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) of 1573400
 
why has the Sec. Council not called for intervention in the Sudan?

In a juxtaposition that you should truly enjoy. It comes down to what the meaning of is is.

Because the French who have major oil drilling contracts in Sudan, The Russians who are supplying most of the weapons for genocide to Sudan, and the Chinese who are benefiting from the Sudanese oil contracts they have all blocked the use of the word genocide in the UN report on Darfur. If the G word was used then sanctions would be required. By preventing its use, they can keep on collecting blood money.

As usual you were right on. who controls the purse strings of the UN and determine its course of action. But as usual, you inferred that the problem was the US, when as in the past the problem is the morally bankrupt Axis of Weasels, France, Russia and China.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News