SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Earl who wrote (9801)2/7/2005 1:27:10 AM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
The main problem I have with the substitute plane theory is it is completely speculative. To the best of my knowledge, there isn't a speck of hard evidence in the public domain to back it up.

Nor, for that matter, was even a "speck of hard evidence" offered to support these assertions:

(1) Flight 93 was flying with a tail wind and debris was scattered for 8 miles along its flight path before it crashed...

(2) Alleged phone calls from a passenger on the plane reported an explosion...

(3) [N]umerous reports of a low flying, unmarked, military style jet in the vicinity of the crash site...

(4) [O]ne report by a vet who heard what he believed to be a missile being fired...

(5) Rumsfeld ["]claiming["] the plane was shot down...

(6) [H]iding all of the physical evidence such as black boxes, recordings, plane parts, etc[.]


Message 20993412

*****

And lest you assert, once again, that I should do 'research' supporting your claims, allow me to reiterate that this is not a collaborative effort. Stand on your own two feet, taking responsibility for and documenting your assertions...or simply accept looking terribly foolish.

:-)

e
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext