SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (671249)2/7/2005 11:12:25 AM
From: DizzyG   of 769670
 
Kenneth, here is what I found when I went to the BLS site:


Clinton Years
1993 7.3 7.1 7 7.1 7.1 7 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.8 6.6 6.5 6.91
1994 6.6 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.1 6.1 6.1 6 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.5 6.10
1995 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.59
1996 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.3 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.41
6.00

1997 5.3 5.2 5.2 5.1 4.9 5 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.94
1998 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.50
1999 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4 4.22
2000 4 4.1 4 3.8 4 4 4 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.97
4.41
Bush Years
2001 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5 5.3 5.6 5.7 4.75
2002 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6 5.78
2003 5.8 5.9 5.8 6 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6 5.9 5.7 5.99
2004 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.5 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.53
5.51
2005 5.2

data.bls.gov

So it would appear that my original information was incorrect. Over an 8 year period, Clinton had an AVERAGE rate of 5.2% unemployment rate.

However, it is interesting to note that Bush has a better unemployment track record when we compare the first 4 years of each administration. So it is disingenuous, at best, to state that Clinton has a better record. Bush still has 4 more years to go. :)

Diz-
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext