Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GST who wrote (157774)	2/7/2005 12:58:11 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

And we both agree i am certain that this is good news. No reason to uncork the champagne yet, but it would be good to get the bottles iced or at least to get the ice. Likudniks and settlers need to give up their dream along with the jihadists and rejectionists. 1967 borders with mutually agreed to adjustments should be the cornerstone of any pact. Perhaps some special status for Jerusalem within Israel. A shared capital building for the governments with the Palestinian part of the building to be treated like embassies are. Perhaps some symbolic right of return for those folks who actually owned land back then and were in areas where it was more israeli force out that arab exhortation that caused them to leave. Perhaps some settlements can remain in Pal territory if Jews living there agreed to live under Pal rule. Those are just some off the top ideas i have had over the years regarding a permanent peace between peoples. Mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next