Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (19218)	2/7/2005 1:51:19 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 28931

<<Flew's observation that DNA is too complex and orderly to be accidental>> "That conclusion was not in the article you presented." I think you are nit picking a bit here. First he (Flew) points out how current evolutionists have not reasonably accounted for reproductive life itself. Rather it assumes it. Then he says quite clearly that DNA research indicates that it is designed. I simply assumed that if something shows the qualities associated with being designed that they would include complexity and order. I'm sure there are others but those two seem pretty clear. Just to be clear here are his words again; "It seems to me that Richard Dawkins constantly overlooks the fact that Darwin himself, in the fourteenth chapter of The Origin of Species, pointed out that his whole argument began with a being which already possessed reproductive powers. This is the creature the evolution of which a truly comprehensive theory of evolution must give some account. Darwin himself was well aware that he had not produced such an account. It now seems to me that the findings of more than fifty years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument to design." Antomy Flew Message 20954618

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next