SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (99208)2/7/2005 11:49:25 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) of 793962
 
Another Easongate eyewitness
This isn’t writing, it’s typing. blog
Davos

Just found this in a post by a French-speaking blogger, Justin Vaisse.

Vaisse is an Affiliated Scholar at the Center on the United States and Europe at the Brookings Institution.

Here's his account of Eason Jordan's comments:

Il faut dire que Eason Jordan, l'un des journalistes stars de CNN, n'a pas mâché ses mots et déclaré de but en blanc que les journalistes en Iraq n'étaient jamais perçus comme neutres et faisaient l'objet d'attaques délibérées (deliberate targeting)... "des deux côtés".

Appelé à clarifier son propos, il a dit que, en-dehors du massacre perpétré par les rebelles, 12 journalistes, y compris américains, avaient été tués par l'armée américaine, non pas dans des "attaques délibérées", mais bon, disons, dans un climat d'hostilité vis-à-vis de la presse dont le ton était donné par Rumsfeld lui-même. Beaucoup de journalistes pensent des jeunes soldats américains que certains parmi eux voudraient bien se faire un journaliste, dans le feu de l'action.

Sans aller aussi loin, Richard Sambrook, la star de la BBC, a renchéri. Et un autre journaliste dans la salle, rappelant aussi l'affaire de l'hôtel Palestine, s'est félicité qu'ici à Davos on reconnaisse enfin l'ampleur du phénomène, bien connu dans le milieu mais pas au-delà.

Le modérateur, David Gergen, en était interloqué, il n'arrivait pas à passer à autre chose.

Here's a translation by Mick Stockinger of UNCoRRELATED:

It must be said that Eason Jordan, one of the star journalists of CNN, didn't mince words in declaring that the intentions of journalists in Iraq were never perceived as neutral and that they were made deliberate targets by "both sides."

Called on to clarify his statement, he said that outside of deaths attributed to rebels, 12 journalists, including Americans, were killed by the American army, not by deliberate attack, but in the context of a hostile climate towards the press, where the tone was set by Donald Rumsfeld himself. Many journalists feel that among young American soldiers, many would like to "do" a journalist in the course of combat.

Without going that far, Richard Sambrook, a BBC star raised the stakes. Another journalist in the room also recalled the Palestine hotel incident which supported the statements made in Davos, and recognizes the scale of the phenomenon, well-known within the journalistic community, but not beyond.

David Gergen, the moderator, was taken aback, but could not manage to change the subject.

Not sure why this hasn't attracted more notice in the blogosphere. Because it would certainly seem to be another nail in Mr. Jordan's coffin. writingcompany.blogs.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext