SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (99276)2/8/2005 9:49:35 AM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (2) of 793624
 
I can see with my own eyes that the CBS/TANG documents were produced on a computer using Microsoft Word.

Can you see where the text file came from that was printed from a computer using Microsoft Word? Can you see how and where that textfile originated?

If it was reprinted from an original file, would that make a difference?

In any case, there has to be an audit trail. Who handed the documents over. Where did they get the document?

The secretary said the document didn't come from her office. We believe her.

She said the words on the document were her bosses known sentiments. A lot of people would not want to believe her on that.

In any case, Dan Rather should not have ran with the story.

But CBS should do a better job investigating its own mistake. Get to the bottom of it - find the perpetrator.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News