Hi Searle,
Re: After that, does the rest really matter?
The key to ending the official charade is to somehow get the American public to look at the 9/11 evidence with a clear, unbiased appraisal of what it is that they are actually seeing.
It has taken me a long time to conclude, as you do, that the WTC Tower collapses were planned demolitions. I certainly didn't want to accept some crackpot theory as proof, but I've now seen enough physical evidence, and evidence of a massive cover-up, to conclude that the buildings were deliberately destroyed by some force other than the airliner impacts and the fires in the towers.
The public will accept the official story until some group is able to produce irrefutable proof that the official story is bunk, such as the Zapruder film provided in the Kennedy assassination. In that instance, Time-Life Magazine refused to show the Zapruder film to the public for years and it was only in 1969, at the New Orleans' District Attorney Jim Garrison's trial of Clay Shaw that the film got some traction with the public. Basically, we have the same situation today as we did in the 1960s. The government is involved in an official cover-up, and the public is, by and large, willing to go along with the deception. And the major corporate media is stonewalling requests for high quality video from the 9/11 Truth Movement. |
