SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (99474)2/9/2005 6:19:40 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793896
 
Joanne Jacobs - English Learners learn English

Forty-seven of students classified as "English Learners" by Caifornia schools demonstrate early advanced or advanced levels of English proficiency, up from 25 percent in 2001, the first year the California English Language Development Test was used. Maybe kids taught in English learn the language more quickly than educators used to think.

Or maybe they're being kept too long in a program they've outgrown. In 2004, when 43 percent tested at the advanced or early advanced level, only 8.3 percent were reclassified as proficient. Superintendent Jack O'Connell wants districts to reclassify more kids, so they can be eligible to take high-level academic classes. The state education board has passed guidelines to tell districts when they've got to admit English Learners have learned English.

Uplifting society -- and pants

The "Droopy Drawers Bill," passed 60-34 by Virginia's House of Delegates, would impose a $50 fine on fashionistas who flash their underwear instead of keeping it . . . under. From the Washington Times:

"It's not an attack on baggy pants," said (Delegate Algie T.) Howell, Norfolk Democrat. "To vote for this bill would be a vote for character, to uplift your community and to do something good not only for the state of Virginia, but for this entire country."

It's not clear if the fine would apply to plumbers, carpenters or other laborers who have problems with low-riding pants. The bill states the fine would apply to those who display their below-the-waist underwear in a "lewd or indecent manner."

Critics say the bill targets black males. Besides, many of those voting for the bill committed fashion crimes in their youth. Several delegates admitted to having worn platform shoes and polyester leisure suits.

Louisiana rejected a similar bill last year, and it's not clear whether Droopy Drawers -- The Education Wonks suggest calling it the Just Say No To Crack Act -- will get past Virginia's Senate.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext