SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (99508)2/9/2005 10:42:33 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) of 793868
 
The WH and the Congressional leadership conned their members last year. This is going to make it difficult to push anything though on a "rush" basis in the future.

Give or Take a Few Hundred Billion
Reason Hit and Run

The White House now puts the cost of the new Medicare drug benefit that President Bush championed at $750 billion over 10 years. But the administration says it's not fair to compare that figure to the $400 billion price tag it used to sell the program to Congress (which was raised to $534 billion two months after the vote). As The New York Times explains, "The original estimate was for the years 2004 to 2013. The new estimate covers the period from 2006, when the drug benefit becomes available, to 2015." But part of the fraud lay precisely in selecting a range of years that would make the progam look a lot cheaper than it really is. Why else include two years before the program would be up and running?

Bush's opponents will be quick to point out that he's trying something similar with his estimate of the transition costs for adding personal accounts to Social Security, keeping the 10-year estimate low by including years when the accounts are not yet available. Unlike the Medicare drug benefit, this spending will not add to the government's debt over the long term, since it will be balanced by lower spending on benefits when peopled with personal accounts retire. But that fact does not excuse the administration's continued use of tricky numbers, a technique that has earned the public's distrust and will make the task of selling Social Security reform harder rather than easier.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News