SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (218526)2/10/2005 9:04:43 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) of 1573682
 
"Skin in the game; the draft."

John, this question by Ted concerns me, like his question about "why protest?". In general, he strikes me as well read. And I always figured that period is pretty well documented. I'll ignore that he got the order wrong in the part about "the 1968 Chicago riots, the shootings of students or the lies by Johnson", but to not understand why the protests existed in the '60s...

And all the ones that just don't seem to understand why the deficits are so important and stagflation is something to be feared. Not in the abstract or at some point in the future, but now.

Are those pieces of recent history so obscure? I don't expect them to feel it in their gut, you have to live through that stuff to get that. But they don't even seem to have an intellectual appreciation for it...

My oldest claims that he was taught in school that we were winning in Vietnam before we just gave up and left. I had a professor say the same thing, but he is from South Korea and they might teach it differently there. Now true, we weren't exactly losing in Vietnam, but wars aren't a binary condition. Winning is not the condition that exists when you aren't losing...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext