5spl Message Board - Msg: 21034917

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : 5spl

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (1802)	2/10/2005 10:00:00 AM
From: mph	Read Replies (2) of 2534

I strongly doubt it would be treated as a discrimination case. At the same time, I don't think the developer has a chance of prevailing. The guy has to live somewhere. It's not his fault that the law requires all the notifications. Nor is that the fault of the police or the party funding the purchase. Assuming he's living a quiet life, he's not doing anything to create a nuisance. The problem was created by the notification procedures. I just fail to see a legal basis on which to get him out, unless he actually creates a nuisance or does something actionable, as opposed to simply being a registered sex offender. As distasteful as it may be, I'm sure there are no laws stating that it is unlawful for a registered offender to live in a neighborhood.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next