SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : LNG

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dennis Roth who wrote (353)2/11/2005 12:04:06 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (1) of 919
 
Mexico mulls new LNG terminal for Pacific coast
Wed Feb 9, 2005 07:05 PM ET
reuters.com

MEXICO CITY, Feb 9 (Reuters) - Mexico is considering allowing a third liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal to be built off its north Pacific coast, even as environmentalists are fighting advanced plans for two other terminals.

The Environment Ministry is studying an application from an Italian-Mexican consortium for a federal environmental permit to build a floating LNG plant off Rosarito Beach, near the border city of Tijuana, a ministry spokesman said on Wednesday.

To go ahead with their project, Italian-owned, Norway-based LNG tanker designer Moss Maritime and Mexican partner TAMMSA would need a list of other permits, including one from Mexico's CRE energy regulator, a process that could take many months.

A CRE spokeswoman said the companies had yet to apply for a regulatory permit.

Mexico has welcomed proposals from foreign oil companies to build LNG terminals along its coast, as the LNG shipped in from as far away as Indonesia and Australia would help fill a supply gap in natural gas in Mexico and the United States.

It has granted permits to ChevronTexaco (CVX.N: Quote, Profile, Research) and Sempra Energy (SRE.N: Quote, Profile, Research) to build LNG terminals in the northwestern Baja California peninsula, which is cut off from mainland gas supplies and depends on imported U.S. gas, and for Royal Dutch/Shell (RD.AS: Quote, Profile, Research) (SHEL.L: Quote, Profile, Research) to build one on the Gulf of Mexico coast.

Yet environmentalists and civic groups in Baja California have begun legal action to try and block ChevronTexaco and Sempra's terminals, saying they will hurt wildlife and put off tourists.

The new proposal for a floating terminal a few miles out to sea could face less opposition than Sempra's proposed onshore plant, which local residents say will be an eyesore, and ChevronTexaco's offshore plant which would be built just off an island refuge for rare birds and seals.

Yet one group said it would fight the new proposal.

"We will not permit these anywhere. Not in the sea, not on the land," said Jose Luis Sanchez, head of a Baja, California group set up to oppose the LNG plants.

He said offshore LNG terminals would upset sea life and birds with their bright lights and the noise of ships unloading, and could cause distress to gray whales on their annual migration from Alaska to breeding grounds in Mexico.

Moss Maritime, a Norwegian company bought in 2001 by Saipem, the oilfield services unit of Italian energy company Eni (ENI.MI: Quote, Profile, Research) , and TAMMSA (Terminales y Almacenes Maritimos de Mexico) could not immediately be reached for comment.

© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.



ooo ( ) ooo
ooo O O ooo
o( V )o
( )
w-w
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext