Hi Searle,
Re: I can also see a bulge-like object below the fuselage but what it is, I can't say?
In reality, it is a fairing.
In some people's vivid imaginations and in bad videos, it is a "pod". Which can more rationally be explained as an artifact of the compression algorithms used to digitize or code images. Stated another way, the easiest and most intelligent explanation I've seen so far is that what some like Von Kliest and Jayhan call "pods" are actually artifacts of the digitization of the images of a B-767s landing gear fairings.
The plane's fuselage does bulge for the fairings where the wings attach. This is what is being misinterpreted as "pods".
Here's what I consider a valid research site on Flight 175:
911research.wtc7.net
Having identified the aircraft as a B-767-222, here's some images of the underside of the craft, showing the fairings:
tinyurl.com
tinyurl.com
General photos of the UA - Boeing 767-222 type:
tinyurl.com
Here's an excellent picture (and discussion) of the B-767 fairing that has been misidentified as a "pod":
oilempire.us
Another clear image of the misinterpreted fairing:
questionsquestions.net
***
Re: To put the boot on the other foot, are you, in fact, 100% sure that the aircraft which struck WTC2 was UA Flight 175?
I agree with the research provided by Jim Hoffman as cited at the website above:
911research.wtc7.net
Hoffman states: At 9:03, a jet which appeared to be a 767 collided with the South Tower. Whether that jet was in fact Flight 175 is questioned by some. Human remains recovered from Ground Zero were identified as belonging to Flight 175 victims.
And this as well:
911research.wtc7.net
Few among even the skeptics of the official story doubt that Flights 11 and 175 struck the North and South Towers, despite the vigorously promoted theories that the towers were hit by something other than the jetliners. 4 New York City's chief medical examiner, Dr. Charles Hirsch, reported about a year after the attack that 33 victims from Flight 11 and 12 victims from Flight 175 had been identified. nydailynews.com
Dr. Hirsch, who was himself injured in the attack, would appear to be a credible authority.
***
Hope this helps.
-R. |
