SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JDN who wrote (672164)2/14/2005 4:36:29 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
"a $1 a gal gas tax increase would drive up the cost of EVERYTHING, cost MANY JOBS and vastly REDUCE Federal Revenues and PAYROLL TAX receipts."

It would reduce the use of oil by increasing it's cost... but a matching *decrease* in payroll or income taxes would more then offset the negative effects on economic growth, as our economy is much less sensitive to pricing changes in oil then it previously was.

"they could give tax rebates to people who buy hybrids, we could make it easier and cheaper to build nuclear power plants."

You propose exchanging one form of national industrial policy for yet another.

(I actually believe that the best way to encourage a rational market-based approach to energy usage in america would be to *eliminate* ALL the subsidies we give to various energy sources and transportation modalities --- and let them ALL fight it out in a free market. For example: nuclear energy has received (and still is) massive government subsidies, oil, coal are subsidized, solar and wind receive subsidies... air transportation is subsidized, rail transportation, surface vehicular transportation, etc., etc. I personally don't believe that piling yet more subsidies on is an efficient method for achieving our society's goals.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext