SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill2/15/2005 9:21:22 AM
  Read Replies (3) of 793742
 
Becker on Social Security
Cafe Hayek
By Don Boudreaux on Social Security

In today’s Wall Street Journal (paid subscription required), Gary Becker says that the case for privatizing Social Security is more political than it is economic.

I don’t separate these concepts as much as Becker does – if markets are desirable, they are desirable only because they best their alternatives (especially state intervention); if state intervention is desirable, ditto.

Still, his points are exceptionally sound. They are nicely summarized in his opening paragraph.

Republicans and Democrats are arguing passionately about the future of Social Security, and the argument, at its core, is about privatization. It is true, as some critics observe, that there is no magical gain in privatizing Social Security, since all systems have to provide incomes for retired persons. By that token, however, there's no gain in privatizing a government steel plant either, since steel still has to be produced, too. Yet there are very good reasons -- with roots in political economy -- to privatize steel. And as with steel (and the like), there are excellent reasons for a privatized individual-account Social Security system.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext