This gets increasingly psychotic. George W. Bush now is a "known (implied) "torturer" of little animals" as a boy? Will you please immediately produce evidence of this fact which you say "is known".
I know this is not Iraq, or Cuba, but the ability to print crap like this and get by with it makes me long for less free speech rights. Free speech rights are purely pure freedom to speak filth rights anyway, and has nothing to do with anything but the spread and promulgation of all things demented, depraved and godless. But I digress. Accusing GWB of being a twisted little sadist as a child borders on something that should get you a knock on the door about 4:00 a.m., and a drive to an undisclosed location. But this is America. You're safe to do so.
Again, state your sources for President Bush being a cocaine user, even once. And his drinking before 40, I think he's in his late 50's now, is he not? What a stone you all have to hurl. "Hey--this guy drank a lot of beer in college, and then tied some on even after that until he gave it up at 40! Hey--that's horrible! We want everyone to hate him! He used to drink beer!"
This form of hypocracy is almost unbearable. It beggers description to quantify it.
And I demand a credible source for your accusation that he hurt little animals as a child and that "this is known".
You are a democrat? Democrats rather make my skin crawl. Sorry about that, but truth is truth. I see a democrat as a semi-Luciferian-- hypocrites, liars and those in league with Satan.
Usually our paths rarely cross, as I just don't want Democratic political thought in my universe. FEW Democrats are really Christian anyway, except some Catholics,and the really Christian catholics I know personally vote Republican, so you do the math on that.
Your political, social, sexual and financial views are your own business. Enjoy them. But you attack GWB in print and I will respond to it all, given the time and chance. |
