Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (72438)	2/17/2005 5:50:03 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) of 89467

R.D., While the iraqbodycount.org website does list a "maximum" of 18,000 casualties, it is important to keep this in perspective. The methodology of the IraqbodyCount group is well considered here: iraqbodycount.net The difference is that the Lancet has used statistical means to extrapolate the unknowable number of casualties, while the IraqbodyCount actuaries clearly state that they are undercounting the actual number of casualties. Even the IraqBodyCount actuaries would find your argument preposterous and disingenuous, to say the least. Who are you getting your facts from R.D.? Jeff Gannon/Jim Guckert? He's seems to be the sort of reliable source you rely on: americablog.blogspot.com You might consider better sources, eh? Cheerio!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next