SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sea_urchin who wrote (10038)2/17/2005 1:32:34 PM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) of 20039
 
I've mentioned my reasons previously why the buildings were blown up.

I believe you mean that you've mentioned previously why you think the buildings were "blown up".

Since you're directing me back to your earlier post, let's look at it a bit more closely. In particular, this line:

WTC1 and 2, however, disintegrated from the top...[T]he appearance of the the disintegrating structure as it disappears from the top down, and in billowing clouds of dust...satisfies me that there had to be a series of major explosions.

Hmm. OK, here is - IMO - an interesting question: how do you think the buildings would have collapsed, absent the theoretical explosives?

Or do you think they would have, otherwise?

e
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext