Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael97123 who wrote (158375)	2/22/2005 1:52:46 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Former UN Weapons Inspector Ritter has much more credibility than Mr. Cheney (who told us we had an "imminent threat" from Saddam, Iraq would welcome us as "liberators", and the U.S. could pay for the intervention with Iraq's oil money). Face the facts...Bush and Cheney LIED to take our country into an UNNECESSARY and counter-productive war...we are viewed as "occupiers" in Iraq and are fueling the insurgency...If you had a friend or relative killed in Iraq would you be pleased that Bush FAILED to do his homework.??..Reagan always said it was important to "trust but verify"...Bush, Cheney and the NeoCONS never wanted to give the weapons inspectors a chance and they never went the extra mile to VERIFY that the intelligence they were using was as accurate as possible. Scott Ritter is not perfect BUT he did predict that Saddam was NOT an imminent threat to the U.S. (No WMDs) and that by invading without strong international support we would get bogged down in a very costly quagmire. -s2@HistoryRepeatsItself.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next