SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DaiTN who wrote (2947)2/23/2005 11:10:19 AM
From: ravenseye  Read Replies (1) of 5425
 
Don't forget Bear Down was given charge of the Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, SI thread 5/19/2000 when tony became mia to serve time for his previous felony conviction.
Message 13739539

If I recall right the recent indictment covers a time period starting in March 2000. My guess is Bear Down wanted/wants to distance from a@p (much like pluvia did in my opinion) in an attempt to avoid being apart of an investigation. There are still people to stand trial and the possibility of another superceding indictment has already been inferred of which we should know more about 4/08/05. sizzle sizzle DAWS DOH DOE

Bear Down also made reference to "Mike Hunt" and the TERN conference call, and I can't help but wonder if the logs from tonys site show the shenanigans about the conference call after reading the following The comedy was worth the 6 bills a month. Isn't that how much people were paying to be members of tonys private site?

Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony,
To: Bear Down who wrote (78029) 6/16/2002 1:56:10 PM
From: Gene C. Read Replies (1) 78035 of 90971

<<< (Thank you Mike Hunt and friends)>>> That was one of the funniest things I ever heard.....when she said next up is Mike Hunt, I nearly wet myself. The comedy was worth the 6 bills a month. p.s. had to reply here cause I,m banned from the guilty or innocent thread for not automatically saying GUILTY!!
Message 17610168

Case Date: 12/19/2003
Project Name: Reining in the Plaintiffs' Bar
On December 19, 2003, WLF petitioned the SEC and the Justice Department (DOJ), asking those agencies to investigate short selling of the stock of Terayon Communications Systems, Inc., which occurred at the same time that a major plaintiffs' law firm was filing a securities law class action against Terayon. WLF's complaint noted that the named plaintiffs in a securities law class action are supposed to represent the interests of all shareholders of the corporate defendant. WLF charged that in the Terayon case, the named plaintiffs actually held massive "short" positions in the company (meaning that they had sold borrowed Terayon stock in hopes that the stock would fall).WLF charged that individuals with a "short" position in company stock have interests adverse to the company's shareholders. WLF asked the SEC and DOJ to investigate whether any civil or criminal laws were violated in connection with the filing of the securities class action suit.
wlf.org

Oh yeah....stay tuned daw, doh, doe...s 4/08/05 will there be a superceding indictment?
lma(zz)o how does the dog hunt?

In early April 2000 Cardinal Partners purchased April “puts” on Terayon stock. Id. Ex. 3 (Cardinal Dep. At 13:2-22), Ex. 23, Ex. 60. The “puts” expired on April 15, 2000. Thus Cardinal was betting that something would cause a decline in Terayon stock between April 7 and April 15.
On April 11, 2000 Cardinal employee Kent McGaughy called into Terayon’s quarterly earnings conference call. McGaughy used a false name, and posing as a bona fide securities analyst, accused Terayon of fraud. Defendants assert that two other people participated in the conference call at Cardinal’s behest. These two, Jonathan Daws and Amir Elgindy also used false names and raised issues of alleged fraud by Terayon.
cand.uscourts.gov

TS - there you go again making accusations about me, seems to be a pattern you follow! Show me the posts you mean, otherwise I consider the source (you) as being full of cheap talk! Let's talk about when you learned that charging for information could require you to register with the SEC as an investment adviser. How much money were you receiving from followers to read "your" reports? You even put out "sell" recommendations, in the same style as the "buy" reports issued by promoters with a flying pig logo. I've read conflicting reports of $39.95 a year and $9.95 a month. You've been tied to tony a long time in my opinion.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext