SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.14-0.8%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Phud who wrote (151512)2/23/2005 11:13:51 AM
From: RinkRead Replies (2) of 275872
 
Elmer, re: The Xeons used were plain 1Meg L2 versions and still they beat the best Opteron systems by a wide margin. They didn't even use the new 2Meg L2 ones much less the upcoming 8Meg Potomacs.

You know as well as anyone else here that Potomacs won't nearly get as much of a speed up as plain vanilla 1MB Xeons because the more cache is on the cpu the less speed up the system gets from next level (e.g. L4) cache in the chipset. Yours is an empty claim, especially when considering dual core Opterons will be released in the same time frame as the X3 chipset from IBM. That's what the article explained too. You can cry victory, but there is none.

To be complete: The chipset is also proprietary. It is also costly. Still, as they make plain vanilla Xeons perform well in a 4-way system it'll save customers looking for Intel-only solutions money and hence will sell comparatively well.

Lastly a year from now or so it will also greatly speed up the 2*1MB dual core netburst Xeons.

Regards,

Rink
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext