SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (72788)2/24/2005 9:22:46 AM
From: Augustus Gloop  Read Replies (1) of 89467
 
I agree with finding common ground but I'm not in favor of abolishing the electoral college. While it appeals to concentrated populations in certain areas of the country it doesn't blend all of the value systems that make up the country. It would place too much power in regions that differ from say midwestern values. It would put a premium on votes cast in big cities and minimize the values of votes in smaller cities that may have a different set of values. Representation would become coast heavy and the mid section of the country would have very little say. I want to believe that the close elections (razor thin) will become less common when we start placing better candidates who represent all walks of life in the race. I believe a guy with my beliefs could appeal to people on both sides of the aisle if given the chance. So maybe what we need to revise are the primaries so that people other than just the wealthy can run and convey their hopes, dreams and plans for the future. Nobody can tell me that we've had the best 2 candidates in the US running for president in the past 2 elections. Elections have become exclusive rather than inclusive and I believe thats where the problem is - not with the electoral college

JMHO
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext