SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonkie who wrote (673234)2/25/2005 9:40:39 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
It is just like a leftist to remain intentionally blind to the moral facts all around and against him, instead to get carried away with nonsense that has nothing to do with anything.

I am not saying you should be punished and never said any such thing. In fact I think you ought not be punished. I also think GZ ought not be punished. My point is this (and please try to get it this time): that if anyone is punished for violating the TOU, then so should you because you certainly have violated the same TOU. Virtually all of us, perhaps save for a precious few, have at some point violated the TOU. Indeed, I don’t know of a single person who posts here with any sort of regularity who has not violated it. But it seems this forum is generally run with greater freedom than the others (which is why I post here). I think it is morally fraudulent to take advantage of this freedom, breaking the TOU as everyone else does, then suddenly appealing to the same TOU you’ve broken after the environment gets too hot for you. Those of us who throw stones should either move to steel houses or take our lumps as they come. It is juvenile of you to come to the playground, get into a slugfest, and then when one of your opponents turns to nail you as you have nailed others, you run to your mother, whining about how he hit you. It is just leftist silliness, fella; and you ought to be ashamed of it.

You didn’t need to “prove” GZ was lying – lying had nothing to do with anything in this discussion. GZ was obviously trying to get under your skin, sensing you were a big enough dweeb to let him do it. That you actually thought you needed “proof” on such a silly issue demonstrates just how fragile a personality you have. Dear me. I have had leftists come here and say all sorts of crap against me, crap that, relative to the little silly accusation against you, was quite serious. They have told all sorts of lies, distorted and otherwise completely corrupted my words against me. It never once even so much as crossed my mind to whine to DAVE or BOB or anyone else about them. Unlike with you, there is no record anywhere, not at any time, not six years ago, not ever, of me ever having sent a private message to any of these folks about anyone else. After all, my opponents are leftists, and I just don’t give a damn what leftists say or think, since leftists are liars by definition. You, on the other hand, took a little dig against you and made a mountain of it. It was incomprehensibly silly and utterly disgusting. You haven’t told “the truth,” as you claim. You don’t have any friendship with the truth at all. You’ve simply abused the implicit rules here and then whined – just as all leftists do.

Pal, I don’t give a hootin’ hell what you have ever told Dave. I really don’t care! Your claims of having complained against someone “only once” do nothing to in any way increase the intrinsic worth of your extraordinarily devalued stock. My concern has to do with your integrity, specifically your lack of it. You’ve come and fought in accord with the generally accepted rules here. Then you abused those rules by appeals to “official” rules. It was a trashy thing to do, far worse than anything GZ has done.

And, dear me, this is not an issue of how many right wingers vs leftist scum have ever whined to the authorities. If you want to make it an issue, then I think you are on very weak ground because the issue here has very little to do with raw numbers and everything to do with the cause, the reason behind the complaint. In every single case I have ever heard, where a right thinking person has complained, it was because some leftist just got on the forum and cluttered it with dozens, in one case even tens of dozens, of off-topic and/or just plain silly posts. Impristine and Sylvestor80 are two such wretches who come to mind here. I just skipped their posts, but to be honest, having to perform so many extra clicks was something of a drag.

But in every case I have seen, where a leftist has complained, it had to do with the same sort of crap we are seeing here with you. The leftist joined the fray, slugging with all his feeble might, to eventually take a hit and then whine to mama about getting hurt. One sodomite leftist actually came here and after ages of fighting actually whined to the authorities because someone used the word “queer” here in reference to sodomites. It was silly and sodomitic, just as your case here is.

So, as far as I am concerned, the frequency of complaints means nothing. There are probably more leftist numbskulls than right-thinking people – and that alone will increase the frequency of complaints. What really matters is the substance of the complaints. I think leftists will lose here every single time.

I personally would just like us to stay quietly down here, killing each other (since it is much easier for right-thinkers to kill leftists) and just let the authorities go about their business in oblivion. There is no need for our banning folks, for ignoring them or complaining against them. There is a general and natural standard of behavior here and we should just let it govern us. I don’t really come here to hear folks who agree with me. I actually want antagonists because they have the greatest interest in destroying my position. I can’t very well test my views on decent people because the decent people will not work very hard against my decency. I want you evil leftists to come after me – so I can get back to knocking you off.

I am not interested in treading on you – not when the GUN of logic allows me to pop you from a distance.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext