RE: "But a more interesting point to make is that that the common feature of all "pod theorists" is the absolutely lousy quality of the videos that they present in evidence."
As close as I can tell, they are working with the best evidence available, which is admittedly not of the best resolution. If you're going to make that argument, then it applies equally to both sides. To state the pod isn't there because the resolution isn't the best, then in the same breath claim the photos are conclusive proof the pod is a standard feature on the plane, is ludicrous. To demonstrate the bogus claim by presenting a photo of an Airbus A330, claiming it's a 767, isn't just deceptive reasoning, it's bald faced lying.
I've never had a hint of respect for the Oil Empire site, and as far as I'm concerned, this one just drives another nail in their coffin. Their self righteous appointment of themselves as the 9/11 evidence police is an instant turn off. Their arguments are absurd. Their constant personal attacks directed at anyone with views other than their own is juvenile at best. Then after spouting all their mindless drivel, demanding a higher standard of research of everyone else, they happily produce a photo of plane, which is not a 767, as evidence a pod is standard on a 767..
|
