The Castle Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (4493)	2/28/2005 5:11:40 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 7936

Using Chernobyl as an example of the risk for these new plants, or even plain old American plants is an example of misjudgeing relative risks. More people have been killed by other energy sources even counting Chernobyl. And if you really believe in global warming as a massive human caused threat that, and that we have to make a big cut in CO2 emissions to avoid it than your choices are, nuclear, world wide recession, or live with disasterous global warming. Tim, I know what the facts are. I am saying its more psychological than real. However, the people who are in charge make the situation worse. When they were trying to pass the Patriot Act, all they talked about was a plane flying into a nuclear reactor and wreaking incredible havoc. How can you then turn around and tell people that nukes are good for them? More importantly, do you think people are going to believe you? ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next