Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Suma who wrote (158667)	3/1/2005 10:36:59 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

"The only comeback to rational thinking on this as I see it is to say Rogue nations cannot have nuclear power. And it is us who decides that. Marking the world safe for Democracy." It may strike you as arrogant of me to say this but I am not willing to live in a world with rogue states having nukes. If that doesnt meet your definition of fairness, tough. "If you were a small country and you knew the power of the U.S. would you not feel more secure knowing that you had some cards to play in the game of poker ? It's one upmanship... " Nope. Nations attained nukes as reaction to others. Russia has nukes so china needs them. China has them so India feels threatened and rightfully so back then. India gets them so Pakistan feels the heat. Thats proliferation and it should be stopped and reversed as best we can. But today rogue nations are playing in the water. You cannot have this NK regime with nukes for an extended period of time before they will be used. Same with Iran if current Mullahs are indeed crazy. And if they are not crazy there is no need for them to have nukes, is there? Who threatens them? The US you might say but its crazy to think that the US is a threat to a non-crazy Iran. mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next