SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Suma who wrote (8110)3/2/2005 2:04:01 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
"There is something in his ear."

Against my better judgement, I looked at the site & clicked
on the picture of the alleged ear piece.

What a waste of time.

What is in his ear? I see absolutely nothing. It's painfully
obvious that the photo on the left shows absolutely nothing
in his ear. Not a gal danged thing but Bush's ear!

The photo on the right is alleged to be the exact same photo
slightly enlarged. It is clear that someone drew an outline
around a piece of flesh from Bush's ear in red. It is a
pathetic attempt to falsely claim there is some crude antenna
that loops around the outer ear (yet it never enters the ear
canal - that too is painfully obvious).

Look at that photo Suma. That alleged ear piece/antenna is
HUGE. It sticks out like a sore thumb. Meanwhile, the opening
to Bush's ear canal in the doctored photo (on the left) is
just as empty as the photo on the right. What's up with that?

But let's assume for a second that piece of flesh is really
an ear piece. It is huge & would be easily spotted from a
distance. Why aren't there hundreds of other pictures from
the debates showing that same alleged antenna/ear piece?

Why is there just this one obviously doctored photo showing
something outside of his ear, but nothing in his ear canal?

Why did Dan Rather run with obvious forged documents when he
could have shown dozens of photos of this alleged ear piece?

And yes Suma, it is a doctored picture. The photo on the
right shows absolutely nothing is there, yet the photo on the
left is alleged to be the same picture, only it is enlarged.

Click on that photo Suma. And when the new page opens, click
on it again. You don't even have to look closely. It's
painfully obvious that they highlighted a piece of flesh.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News