Moderate Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Suma who wrote (15765)	3/3/2005 3:04:15 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) of 20773

Fairness,justice and ethics went out the window when O.J. was freed. Having not watched the daily barrage of testimony, I can't say. In general, a couple of observations. It's difficult for me to imagine why the prosecution took as long as it did with a circumstantial case. I think a shorter trial would have favored the prosecution. Second, the prosecution took a huge gamble with the glove. A couple of attorneys have said to me that you never ask a question that you don't know the answer to. Taking that gamble suggests to me that in spite of what the prosecution was saying in front of the cameras, they weren't convinced that they had a case that would meet the standard of reasonable doubt. And Fuhrman taking the 5th couldn't have helped. It's not supposed to influence the jury, but I'd guess that it did. At the end of the day, 12 jurors that sat through all that crap unanimously found him "not guilty". A jury in a civil case has a lower standard of proof than that in a criminal case. jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next