SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : INHL - Inhale Therapeutics - Pulmonary Insulin!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: deeno who wrote (214)3/3/2005 3:43:32 PM
From: tuck  Read Replies (1) of 225
 
[Antibody Response to Inhaled Insulin in Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes]

>>J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Mar 1; [Epub ahead of print]

Antibody Response to Inhaled Insulin in Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes.

Fineberg SE, Kawabata T, Finco-Kent D, Liu C, Krasner A.

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, CT, USA.

Objective To compare antibody responses to inhaled human insulin vs. sc human insulin and to determine if insulin antibody binding is associated with adverse clinical consequences. Research Design andMethods Insulin antibody data from initial phase II/III trials were analyzed comparing the efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin with various agents, including sc insulin. Additionally, data from a 24-month extension of the phase III studies were examined. Data were pooled into the following three groups based on insulin treatment status at baseline: patients with type 1 diabetes, patients with type 2 diabetes insulin-using and non-insulin-using at baseline. Immunoglobulin class analysis was also performed on randomly selected sera from type 1 patients at the end of the initial trials. Results In the initial trials, greater insulin antibody binding was observed in patients receiving inhaled insulin vs. sc insulin. The greatest antibody responses to inhaled insulin were observed in patients with type 1 diabetes (non-parametric comparison of medians at end of study 22.0% binding [unadjusted 95% CI 19.5, 24.5]) and the lowest responses were observed in non-insulin-using patients with type 2 diabetes in which there was no difference in medians values at end of study. There were no correlations between antibody binding and glycemic control (measured using HbA1c), insulin dose requirements, hypoglycemic events, or pulmonary function (measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide [DLco]). Antibody responses were IgG in type. Differences in antibody levels observed in patients with type 1 vs. type 2 diabetes were maintained over the 24-month extension trials. Peak antibody levels across all groups were generally observed after 6-12 months of insulin therapy. Inhaled insulin therapy was not associated with a greater incidence of allergy or other hypersensitivity reactions. Conclusion Inhaled insulin was observed to produce a larger antibody response than sc insulin. Insulin antibody binding has not been associated with adverse clinical consequences in trials to date.<<

As I've noted before on the ARDM thread, NKTR/PFE apparently did not make the night time glucose measurement that torpedoed the AerX diabetes program (at least I haven't been able to find mention of it). There was speculation that antibody response was somehow the cause, but we may never know, as Novo seems to have bought the program for peanuts so as to bury it. Has PFE/NKTR been given a target date by EMEA as to when it will respond to the application? I get the impression that PFE's target date for NDA is based on hearing from EMEA; simply because the timing would be about right and it seems too big of a coincidence.

Cheers, Tuck
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext