9/11: The DOUBTS GROW BY THE DAY --
Party Time,
First, examine this website: judicial-inc.biz
Here's more on hi-rise fires that were 10 to 100 times more intense than those experienced at the WTC complex on 9/11:
serendipity.li
[Be sure to scroll to the bottom and listen to what the WTC building manager had to say about the "mesh-netting" structure of a tube-in-tube tower.]
And this photo of a woman standing in the area of the WTC tower that was purportedly hot enough to deform steel is a classic:
thunderbay.indymedia.org
[If anyone has the higher resolution version of this image, or the video link, please post the URL to me. Thanks. I'm updating my files to reflect the vast amount of information that is now available on the inevitable conclusion that the official story is the official lie.]
***
Here is something this is straight out of Orwell's "1984". You will perhaps recall that the hero of that book, Winston Smith, was employed at the Ministry of Truth, where his job was to re-write history. Others in that operation were employed to make sure that the news always conformed to the ideological shifts in Big Brother's thinking. So the news had to be constantly renewed in order to keep the people from remembering inconvenient history. Here's an example of this occuring today. When the Madrid disaster occurred last month, it was briefly reported on sources like the AP website, various regional and local newspapers that carried the AP wire story and on Yahoo News. Today, all of that record has vanished. Less than a month later, and it is as if Madrid never happened for millions of average and unsophisticated Americans. Here's an archive of one AP story that has officially "disappeared":
Message 21048746
The mainstream media is perhaps the greatest enemy to democracy in America today.
***
Here's another photo that is worth several thousand words. This is an image of the South Tower about 2 seconds into the collapse. Notice the red arrow point to a demolition squib in the lower portion of the photo. Why is this important? And why do I blatantly call it a demolition squib? Because it is an extremely energetic ejection of material several floors below the main collapse sequence, with the intervening floors remaining intact. The obvious logical implication is that the "pancake theory" of floor trusses cascading on each other cannot possibly be the correct interpretation of how this demolition squib has come about.
911research.wtc7.net
More photos here:
911research.wtc7.net
***
Re:
By the way, I traveled along the many links you provided in your post and found the material, especially some of the references within your link, as remarkable.
Party Time, you are just getting started down the rabbit hole. I've introduced you to less than 2% of what I have in my computer files, and less than 1% of what I have in my head, on DVDs, books, video tapes and CDs on the matter of the greatest "false flag" operation the world has ever seen.
Are you ready to take the red pill?
***
Re: The description of the second plane hitting the South Tower and veering to the right upon impact, thus its fuel moving as much outside of the building as inside of the building creates a condition worthy of deep pondering: How could the building with the least structural impact, the least amount of burning jet fuel, collapse before the North Tower which had experienced a direct hit with all of that plane's fuel burning inside of the tower?
After you've given it the amount of thought, research and concentration that I have, you can reach only one conclusion. Both towers were purposefully demolished in order to create a shock & awe event that would completely mobilize the American public to accept war as the only answer to the dangerous fantasies of terrorism that we cannot see, but which we must fight. [Compare Adam Curtis's excellent psychological analysis in "The Power of Nightmares": commondreams.org ]
The South Tower collapsed about 55 minutes after the impact and fireball. Why did it collapse first? Many cynics, and me among them, believe that it collapsed first because the fires were going out and the cover story envisioned by the perpetrators was being blown. They reasoned that too many people would question a building blowing up after the fire department had gained the upper hand on controlling the few remaining small fires at Floors 78 and above.
***
Re: And, given the references the writer provided, how is it possible that the fuel could melt enough of all of the steel so as to enable a collapse?
The short answer is that it is impossible. The longer answer involves a testing lab in Britain that performed a test on a six floor car park. The engulfed the exposed steel frame to intense heat mimicking what would occur if gasoline and diesel fuel tanks were exploding and burning on the various levels of the car park. What they found is that while the petroleum fires could reach 800 C. (1,500 F.), the steel itself never rose above about 350 C. (660 F.) due to the fact that steel is an excellent conductor of heat and as sections would be heated by the intense hydrocarbon fire, the steel would rapidly dissipate the heat energy into adjoining regions, never allowing intense spot heating to get the steel to a temperature at which it lost more than a small percentage of its strength.
Here's the results of several car park tests:
corusconstruction.com
And here's a graph of the temperature/strength ratio of structural steel:
web.archive.org
As you can see from the chart, steel retains 100% of its strength at 350 C. Furthermore, remember that the greatest load on the steel columns was the wind load, not the gravitational load, and that the wind was essentially calm on 9/11. Thus, the steel columns would have had a safety factor for gravitational load of approximately 500% of the actual static load. The official story simply refuses to address this issue.
***
Re:
Just the dynamic combination of how the planes hit, how the fuel and what amount of fuel burned and the manner of the collapse of the structures is enough to beg questions. Add to this the many, many mysterious conditions surrounding the day of 9/11, and both before and afterwards, one can only I wonder.
And the American people are beginning to wake up to the nightmare prospect that the cover-up perpetrated by the Kean-Zelikow Commission hides a much darker truth about the nature of deep politics and the real nature of the criminal elites who've stolen the reins of power in this nation. |
